FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - UA Inconsistent Messaging re Basic Econ - full-size carry on
Old Dec 31, 2023 | 4:32 pm
  #12  
Lux Flyer
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2,345
Originally Posted by NovacYTO
One more note for any other travellers running into this issue:
My ex-Canada Basic Economy ticket has the following endorsement line: NRF-BE/NOCHGDAFTDPT/NOASR
vs
It appears from a few searches, that carry-on restricted BE tickets have and additional endorsement (which mine does not have): NONREF/NOCHGS/NOCBBG/NOASR
Of course, given the inconsistency on the website and during the sale process,
what is the inconsistency in the booking process? You booked a canade basic exonomy fare, which is eligible for a carry on and the display gave a green check for it when describing the restrictions. Your ticket is properly endorsed for a canada basic economy fare, which means you have the proper fare basis.

As long as you haven‘t created a fare break in the US, there should be no issue. If you want people to validate fuerher, go under my trips and view the fare rules. You can post just the fare basis and people would be able to advise you.

edit: you certainly have a fare break if you‘re getting N on one of the segments. But I‘m curious what day or how you‘re searching - your original screenshot is showing only the 2 stop options when there are multiple 1 stops available. Even when I dig to find those 2 stops it‘s not creating fare breaks.

Last edited by Lux Flyer; Dec 31, 2023 at 4:49 pm
Lux Flyer is offline