FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Evaluating AC's performance and competitive offering in 2023-25
Old Dec 16, 2023 | 10:40 pm
  #112  
billdokes
30 Countries Visited
2M
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC SE 100K MM; Marriott Lifetime Titanium, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 4,039
Originally Posted by Transpacificflyer
Perhaps, because you do not understand how performance is measured and are offering an incomprehensible rationalization for AC's poor performance. You dismiss overall OTP. Fine. I did not disagree. You then stated OTP should be route specific. Well, that is what I did: I provided a route specific example of KE vs AC on the YYZ to ICN route with KE having a superior OTP in respect to average OTP and extreme delays. This is again demonstrated on the YVR to NRT route AC 3 vs JL 17. Similar departure times, JL flies a slower 767 ( cruise speed ave. 867 kmh) vs AC 789 ( cruise speed ave. 913 kmh). JL is usually ontime, with the worst time delay of about an hour. AC is more likely than JL to arrive late with its worst delay 2 1/2 hours. One won't make the onward connections if flying late with AC, but can do so with a JL flight.
According to Expert Flyer, the JL flight is scheduled at 25 mins longer than the AC flight and operates on-time 83% of the time with an average 20 min delay. The AC flight operates 72% of the time with an average 33 min delay.

Sounds pretty much like a wash to me.
billdokes is offline