FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Evaluating AC's performance and competitive offering in 2023-25
Old Dec 16, 2023 | 8:33 pm
  #111  
Transpacificflyer
1M
40 Countries Visited
80 Nights
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC SE, Bonvoy, Centara, Hyatt
Posts: 3,216
Originally Posted by warrens
No it's not!
You didn't even slightly understand what I told you.
Perhaps, because you do not understand how performance is measured and are offering an incomprehensible rationalization for AC's poor performance. You dismiss overall OTP. Fine. I did not disagree. You then stated OTP should be route specific. Well, that is what I did: I provided a route specific example of KE vs AC on the YYZ to ICN route with KE having a superior OTP in respect to average OTP and extreme delays. This is again demonstrated on the YVR to NRT route AC 3 vs JL 17. Similar departure times, JL flies a slower 767 ( cruise speed ave. 867 kmh) vs AC 789 ( cruise speed ave. 913 kmh). JL is usually ontime, with the worst time delay of about an hour. AC is more likely than JL to arrive late with its worst delay 2 1/2 hours. One won't make the onward connections if flying late with AC, but can do so with a JL flight.
Transpacificflyer is offline