FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - BA denied wife & daughters boarding due incorrect use of Timatic
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 6:07 am
  #316  
orbitmic
FlyerTalk Evangelist and Ambassador: The British Airways Club
5M
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Diam, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 33,172
Originally Posted by percysmith
OP's wife was in a bad bad place when the second agent stated he'll offload her and the kids. More time is better than less, but, the agents on the spot have really nailed their colours to the mast at this point (see below).
I think the issue here is that you seem to assume that the offloading decision was independent from the timing. I think there is (immense) path dependency here and that offloading decision was taken as it was precisely because the agents had to close the flight due to timing. They might have done it anyway if there had been 2 hours to go but it's certainly not a given and my guess is that they would not have done it as long as the discussion was ongoing (even if they believed that would be the final decision).

Originally Posted by percysmith
Unless the front line desks have phones, the mere fact immigration is working does not mean they answer phones. The whole shift may be on the desks and no-one's in the back.
I'm sure 13901 can explain better than me, but my understanding is that queries always go to back office, never to front facing officers. I also don't think there ever is any instance in any large airport, even in the most dysfunctional systems, in which only front facing officers man desks with noone in the back office. The whole point is that front office staff may have queries, need back office colleagues to do checks, etc. Of course there may be cases when all back office people are busy, and this may well be what happened when CX couldn't get through, but why would we start from the assumption it would "necessarily" have been the case and failed.

Originally Posted by percysmith
If one has access to them, yes. Obviously Sir has to be important enough to rate agent #2 talking to them.
Again, I think you try to double guess too much here. I absolutely agree with you not all customers were created equal, but that's not as simple as x is always yes and y is always no, and in this case, passengers in J - even without status - are not actually bottom of the pecking order either - they'd "formally" feature as part of the "high value" category.
orbitmic is offline