FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Interesting Brand Hierarchy
View Single Post
Old Oct 24, 2023 | 6:47 am
  #8  
arlflyer
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DCA
Posts: 7,777
Originally Posted by GenZ
I must be the only person that absolutely loves the W brand.

I've only stayed at the W Osaka and W Bali - Seminyak, but I can honestly say I already prefer it over the Ritz-Carlton as a brand.

Maybe I've just not had the misfortune of visiting a W in the US?
Yes. Having been to a few in the U.S., the first word that comes to mind when I think of a W is "trashy". The second word is "garish". The whole brand is predicated on trying too hard to be avant garde, and ends up attracting the types of people who want to become social media famous but have no actual class or taste.

The non-US ones I have set foot in seem much better, as is the case with most hotels. To the original point of this thread, I believe that the originally-posted material is indeed a fair representation of the *global* hierarchy of the brands.
arlflyer is offline