Originally Posted by
patvd
Also COC/T&Cs are only applicable to your contract with BA, therefore there’s no discussion possible about the final destination.
BA didn’t incorrectly use Timatic, putting MRU as destination in Timatic was a shortcut you shouldn’t have taken without consulting BA!
Airlines are not legally obliged to take onward travel, on different contracts, into consideration. They often do, but in your case there were, unfortunately, too many red flags involved. Hopefully BA gets your family on the direct MRU, a commercial gesture I would consider as all’s well that ends well.
In order to satisfy the ‘reasonableness’ test the airline must take
all relevant evidence in to account if it wishes to avoid liability under UK261.