Originally Posted by
Fabo.sk
Pax did not rely on pax experience. Pax relied on actual authorities on the requirements to enter Argentina.
To quote the OP (bolding mine):
Originally Posted by
Edelweiss101
I attempted to explain that I knew that Argentina accepted Swiss temporary passports, as I had previously traveled there using one.
Originally Posted by
Fabo.sk
If the situation was flipped and traveldoc would say that he was allowed to enter but the Argentine government said no, do you think KLM could say "but the website said yes" and all would be forgiven?
If the situation was flipped OP was allowed to board the flight only to be denied entry upon arrival.