Originally Posted by
flyerby
What's the difference between the OP's case and a person who has along connection but is not entitled for a hotel? Do you think in latter case they also should be baned from the lounge?
I think that the TK lounges are notorious for having people lying around overnight in various stages of undress, and that this makes it uncomfortable for other guests.
If one is already landside, it doesn't seem too much to ask that one stays in a hotel instead of going to the airport at midnight with the intention of sleeping in the lounge.