Originally Posted by
mario
Of course, this is just my opinion. The ultimate decision of whether or not clause 3c4 is ambiguous and should be interpreted contra proferentem will be made by the court in a legal case. However, I believe that the contra proferentem rule is a reasonable interpretation of this clause, and it would protect consumers from unfair or unexpected terms.
Exactly (I think
). It's not black and white, and is open to interpretation.
If somebody booked a 2 hour connection on different tickets, then that would be "tough luck" IMO. However, by booking a flight a day before, the OP took all reasonable precautions to ensure he/she made it in plenty of time for the next flight.