Originally Posted by
stupidhead
KAL says they'll pay any price to make it happen per this Bloomberg article -
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...says#xj4y7vzkg
Personally, I doubt it. If DOJ says "give up the JV with Delta" or "You can acquire OZ but OZ must remain in *A and join the UA TPAC JV", I doubt they would accept that.
No, because that would defeat the whole purpose of the transaction. With deals like this the goal is to bolster the acquirer's market position, not to prop up a rival airline and its membership in a competing alliance. The only way this transaction makes sense is to eventually fold Asiana into Korean.
There have been plenty of deals in which one airline invests in another as a going concern, but this has always been a foreign carrier acquiring a stake in another airline. I can't think of any transaction in which an airline has bought a local direct competitor and kept it intact. Air Canada didn't with Canadian, United didn't with Continental, American didn't with USAirways.