Originally Posted by
highlanderfil
When the news broke about Hyatt purchasing the Mr. and Mrs. Smith reservation service, potentially affecting my reservation for this August at the Sand Hotel, I booked a backup reservation at the Nordica. The Sand hasn't cancelled yet (I don't believe the acquisition has gone through yet), but it got me thinking - maybe I should just go ahead and stay at the Nordica anyways? I know the Sand is more central, but does it really matter in a city Reykjavik's size? Also, I've been advised the small rooms at the Sand aren't super comfortable (and I know I won't get an upgrade due to general unavailability - already emailed asking). And free breakfast (Hilton Gold) is worth a lot more in Iceland than it is in most other countries. Any opinions?
It's easy to get around the city. It's so small I wouldn't concern myself.
Consider the Curio Konsulat. I've stayed twice, found it ideally situated for exploring the city by foot, elegant and rich in character. Status recognition was generous. An upgrade via the app then another at arrival both times. Upscale locally handmade boxes of chocolate as welcome gifts.
On another note, If you have any interest in Icelandic thermal spas, I can't strongly enough recommend staying a night at Silica hotel and getting the package giving access to the famed Retreat spa "Ritual" next door. Both part of the "Blue Lagoon" complex but much more exclusive, not the public pool like experience of the Blue Lagoon.
Room rates at Silica are very high, while they're obscene at the Retreat. Since Silica lets you access the Retreat spa "Ritual" for a modest fee, it's a nice way to save $1k+ per night. IMO, its utterly unique to Iceland not to be missed.