FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - The 2023 BA compensation thread: Your guide to Regulation EC261 / UK261
Old Mar 26, 2023 | 10:43 am
  #546  
corporate-wage-slave
Moderator: Iberia Club, Airport Lounges and Ambassador: The British Airways Club
150 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 70,929
Originally Posted by thomasd21
Are these posts still correct? As per that case Etihad (I think) was operating on behalf of Czech Airlines from Abu Dhabi to Bangkok, under codeshare arrangement. The Etihad flight met with significant delay, but the court ruled Czech Airlines had to pay 261 compensation despite them not operating and the affected flights being operated outside of the EU. Given that, seems to suggest the examples given in the post (Qantas) would actually be covered, and payable by BA?
As I see it, the law is fairly settled on things like QR to DOH, QR out of DOH. It is also settled for codeshares starting in Europe. I woujld expect CEDR to uphold these two examples. If the second flight was Prime and not in the EU and not a European carrier then CEDR would probably fail but MCOL / appellate may succeed - personally I doubt I would bother. I would say the landscape is shifting to end to end ticketing view of the delay. There is a second point that if it's not a codeshare then you have to go after the non European carrier and they may simply not engage with the issue at all and may not have a UK registered address.
corporate-wage-slave is offline