Originally Posted by
Sigwx
We currently have a potential issue with 5g in the US in and around airfields but even that doest look to be an issue at all in practice, yet lots of words written and policies with 'acceptable means of compliance' notes that just confirm the bleeding' obvious of actions to take in the unlikely event something does behave as expected.
As one who has to endure reading the words of such policies, there is some push-back by the FCC of allowing 5G close to airfields due to (potential/actual) interference. (It's not the compliant systems you have to worry about, it's the non-compliant ones!).