Originally Posted by
jpezaris
I've seen that too. It sounds like a contractual statement, in my non-lawyer opinion. As in, they openly stated that they were committed to ensuring these passengers (like the OP, in this case) would be on their connecting flight. It was a voluntary utterance. It was specific to a particular situation. Companies should not be able to get away with making promises like that and not fulfilling them.
I'm not going to offer legal advice here, but I will caution FT'ers that legal issues are often complex and most of the advice you get online is wrong or incomplete.