Originally Posted by
sbams
Actually if they had shared 1 room in the name of the father (not the son or the holy ghost

) then the son would have also been given lounge access. So it seems a bit stingy that while paying much more (2nd room) they didn't give the 2nd person access
Your reasoning makes sense from first principles; however we are not conducting white-space ideation, but rather are talking about a loyalty program with well-defined and publicly-visible rules.
I do like your joke though!