FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Disruption Strategy
View Single Post
Old Jul 18, 2022 | 1:29 pm
  #18  
Thai-Kiwi
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WLG/BKK
Programs: NZ Koru Plat, TG*G, QF G, Accor Plat
Posts: 12,785
Originally Posted by mad_atta
I agree it's not quite so generous on the NEOs but still entirely acceptable and vastly better than the competition. What I find odd on the NEOs is how short they made the seat cushion - was it to make the legroom look better? - but although I find it a little disconcerting, especially since I have long legs, I don't find it uncomfortable so I guess no harm, no foul. I do find the higher windowline and slightly greater width on the A320 family distinctly preferable to the 737.

Yes, you really would. WD just seems like a pathetically thrown-together excuse of a product, and so half-hearted. And yet, here it still is all these years later, effectively unchanged. I can see some appeal to people who otherwise might not get lounge access but for the most part it just seems a waste of the front two rows.
Works Deluxe does not even provide lounge access. (I had access as TG*G). Just an extra bag, priority heck-in and boarding, and an empty middle seat‘.

I was initially booked Seat only, but elected to buy-up to WD to at least give it a try once.
Thai-Kiwi is offline