Originally Posted by
Adam Smith
Solved:
- PEK-ULN: clearly a 50% earning fare; deleted
- ZRH-ICN: was entered in wrong cell, actually YYZ-IAH distance; deleted
- BKK-HKG: had two different entries in the two halves of the table, one of which was 1065 (<2% different from haversine), although no idea where 1172 came from; fixed
- FLR-SFO: actually FRA-SFO distance - how did [MENTION=599574]canadiancow[/MENTION] not catch that?!
; deleted
- YYZ-SLC: 1902 was Comfort fare, base was 1654; fixed
- YYZ-TPA: same as BKK-HKG, one entry was about right, haven't figured out where the incorrect one came from; fixed
- LAX-RAR: another with different data in the two halves, looks like it was just a typo (4682 vs 4982); fixed
Incorrect, pending confirmation from original posters:
- YOW-YEG: [MENTION=194158]YZF_Elite[/MENTION]
- DEN-DFW: [MENTION=10078419]MillennialMiles[/MENTION]
Likely correct, just somewhat high % due to small distances:
- ICN-PEK
- MUC-TXL
- YEG-YYC
- VIE-ZAG
- FRA-VIE: I can confirm this one, actually. I got 187 on a 50% earning fare in 2018, so 373 is definitely closer than 385
Definitely wrong, but I haven't identified the root cause yet:
- FLR-LHR: definitely entered in the wrong cell, just haven't figured out where it came from yet
- DEN-SNA: not sure
- LHR-VIE: off by right about 30%. Did OS have 70% earning fares at some point?
- DXB-VIE: same
- ISL-VIE: same
- KUL-PEK: this wouldn't be OS, probably CA, but same?
I flew with my son (no status) YYC-YEG in 2016 (i.e. "old Aeroplan") on a Flex fare and can confirm he received 158 miles.