Originally Posted by
corporate-wage-slave
The lawyers may be getting a little twitchy on this one. What if a USA based passenger duly attributed their COVID-19 infection to BA's failure to follow federal law and started procedings against BA on that basis? What if they booked an AA codeshare and found out late in the game what metal they were really on? If I was in BA Legal I would want to procede with caution.
If that's the logic then no airline can remove face cover policies until the US does since any flight could contain a USA based passenger who may be connecting onwards to the USA. I am not sure I see it myself, and if that reasoning is correct I think it an overly cautious approach.
I am also not clear why this wasn't squared off before BA announced the change. Does no one speak to each other at BA or do they all work in silos?