Originally Posted by
corporate-wage-slave
Negatives
- This is naturally LGW but they just have thirsty 777s
Not to take away from the excellent analysis, but isn't that a problem for just about every LGW long-haul route?
Where there is a high level of O&D, potentially price sensitive travellers who may nevertheless be willing to pay a premium for non-stop (i.e., relatively expensive I, T, and <N fares, but relatively few in higher fare buckets) and potentially long flights (South America, Caribbean, Indian Ocean, maybe eventually Thailand/Bali?) isn't every single LGW route ideal for a 787 or 350 and absolutely terrible for a 777? In fact, isn't a 777 pretty terrible for everywhere except the East Coast and Middle East?
Is BA looking at moving away from 777s in Gatwick any time soon?