No, no, no. That’s not how it works in law. The accusations made by some suggest a very serious criminal enterprise is in play yet there is not a single piece of evidence that would support such a charge. Let’s not cast aspersions, especially on those who do not have a right of reply. It’s not fair and it’s potentially libellous - “Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence”.

It is the accuser who must prove his case.