Originally Posted by
englisha
Is this RJ flight the only non BA operated flight which is categorised at SH+? Until now, I thought SH+ was only for BA flights...Does sound like a break from the norm
Originally Posted by
Flying Yazata
AY and AT have already up until now had 80 TP routes in C. Nothing entirely new exactly.
I've just looked at all the AY 2k+ flights and some of the AT 2k+ flights as listed here:
https://pointstobemade.com/every-one...er-2000-miles/
And they all earn 140tps in business... What are the exceptions?
Originally Posted by
lsquare
That's ridiculous. You're upset because you felt like you got screwed over and now want to screw over people that take advantage of LAX-JFK?
Is it ridiculous? Why should I pay £1500 for LHR-AMM with a oneworld partner and only earn 160TP return, while for the same price someone else can book JFK-LAX and earn 280? And therefore be closer to retaining status than I am? Despite both flights being over 2000 miles? (no I am not arguing for a revenue based system, but I am arguing for comparability)
Basically why is there one rule for nearly all OW flights over 2000 miles, but some new non-rule for this one?
(note every other RJ European capital still earns long haul TP) Ba are not adhering to their own rules on partner flights (just because them themselves can no longer compete on hard product)
Why should I be screwed over and not everyone else, or more fairly, why should everyone else (route wise) get historic benefits but not a route I frequent?