FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Married Segment Logic forcing Long Layover?
Old Dec 5, 2021 | 9:25 am
  #12  
findark
Flyertalk Evangelist, Moderator: United Airlines MileagePlus
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL DM, UA Nostalgist, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 16,142
Originally Posted by xliioper
There are numerous cases where next available flight is over 4 hours when connecting through SFO to ASE (BNA-SFO-ASE, for example), but UA won't price these on a single fare. EF shows married inventory on these long connections, but you can't actually purchase them on a single fare.
That's routing though; BNA-ASE is via BNE-HOU/DEN/CHI-ASE. I'm fairly sure inventory will pull the through-inventory rule if the connection is short enough to ordinarily count as a transfer (4h00 domestic or next scheduled flight) or not otherwise (regardless of fare rules). You might be right that the fare rules on SFO-YYC actually auto-price like "up to 12 hours, no stopover", just a weird wording. That does seem to be how the computer does it. My original point was that there is no inventory marrying rule for the >4h00 connections on SFO-DEN-YYC because that part of the computer thinks it's impossible to price on a single fare. The fact that assumption is wrong is the whole reason why the situation in the OP came up.
findark is online now