Originally Posted by EWR764

Here's a question... would we prefer a straight C/D replacement?

Or, a new, additional concourse which (assuming it is built out further):
- eliminates the A regional gates, which feel more temporary than C/D
- enables UA to grow the IAD hub to something closer to CLT, say ~600+ daily flights
- keeps C/D substantially as-is?

IMO, a bigger UA IAD operation with a better schedule (more destinations, more banks) is of greater use to me than the current state, even with the C/D gates remaining in use for another decade or two.