. I was expecting the potential for some inebriated cowboy giving a rouge attendant's 16 gauge septum ring a tug much as one does with a bull, or having another's 4cm earlobe plug fall into someone's drink. Fortunately, it is not carte blanche. Highlights are;
-3 items per ear, so no pincushion people.
- Nose rings must be flat or flush and if hoop, small and only 1 is allowed, so no worries of a display worthy of a Jim Rose sideshow.
- Most neck and face tattoos are still excluded.

Unfortunately, while the ruling may appear reasonable to some, it is unfair and discriminatory and will be difficult to administer. There is a considerable amount of subjectivity allowed, which will result in allegations of discrimination. Only visible tattoos that do not refer to “nudity, hatred, violence, drugs, alcohol, discrimination or harassment.” are allowed. IMO,there is far too much room for dispute. What if someone tattoos Delacroix's classic Liberty leading The people, with her ample bosom exposed? The 1830 classic painting symbolized the French Revolution and is valued as part of France's patrimony, but I do not think its main attraction would go without a fuss from some upset passenger. A clenched fist is a common symbol of first nation strength and resilience e.g. Warrior Society, but to others, can be interpreted as a sign of violence. And what if a FA of Jain of Buddhist belief has a swastika, what then? We live in a society where being offended is a way of life The AC policy of no visible tattoos was reasonable and acted to prevent passenger confrontations and complaints.It also reduced the potential for staff conflict. Sometimes a blanket restriction is the only viable option.