Originally Posted by techgirl
Since I am no longer a moderator, I feel like I can speak with some degree of freedom.
I decided to resign as a moderator when I got tired of my e-mail being flooded by folks using the "report post" function to ask me to change the title of someone elses post (to make it more clear/concise), to complain about things being slightly off-topic, or to tell me they thought someone could have stated their position in a slightly nicer way. Or to spend every ten minutes policing the forums for any post that appeared to be off-topic - even if that off-topic post wasn't causing any problems during the two or three hours I happened to be on a flight or sleeping or whatever. I would log on FT and spend ten minutes reading private messages about moderation (or the lack thereof) before I could ever get to the forums I actually moderated.
Honestly, I liked being a moderator - mainly because I rarely changed anything. Very little on the forums I had needed to be heavily monitored... but trust me, there are members out there who want to play grammar/decorum/nitpick police and I would wager that most moderators spend more time dealing with this small handful of folks (three or four "well meaning" folks, in my case) by private e-mail or private message than they spend actually touching a single post on FT.
I read this not as we need more moderators, but rather we need to set the right expectations. There should also be limits on how many times someone can send email or private message to a moderator, so that those people use it judiciously (make it like something like once a week - in a couple of years in OMNI I used these functions maybe 2-3 times). Also prevent the spillover of these cases to the ORP forum.
As mentioned in most cases there was no need for moderation. Moderators should not have to be logging in every hour and fixing posts.