Originally Posted by
MojaveFlyer
I'm not sure I understand this response. If I get window/aisle, and United sells the middle seat, that's fine, one of us will move and the middle person ends up with a better seat. If that middle goes empty (and United will certainly sell it if they can; I have not heard that they are blocking middles these days), why shouldn't I be one of the lucky ones to benefit? UA already allows me to book highly desirable seats (exit rows at booking time) and in part as a result I do not buy the cheapest fares - win/win it seems to me.
As for "giving away" a seat, I don't make the decision who gets it. If its filled, it's either someone with status who books ahead, or a last minute E- seating to the lucky person who gets put into a more desirable seat than they paid for.
As for the "customer service" I am absolutely fine with any stated rules - I can use my knowledge of the rules to decide which carrier to fly. Doing it in stealth mode takes away a benefit UA has given me (advance seat booking in exit rows, and E+ seating in general) in recognition of the million + BIS revenue miles I took on them. Small bits of preferential treatment - and they are getting fewer and fewer - keep me flying on UA even though I'd save money on many trips (and it is my money these days) on other carriers.
You have to understand that in the hierarchy of customers, those who are depriving the airline of something it might be able to sell, or forcing a stranger into a middle seat, might not be viewed as "good customers".
The airline is may be quite aware that some folks who regularly do this aren't going to be happy and may threaten to fly another airline. That may even be part of United's motivation. They may see these people as causing a problem they would like to solve.