Originally Posted by
Kacee
What cabin was the family member booked in? If economy, the email confirm was wrong. Nonetheless, the passenger should be allowed to rely on that email, so I would complain to UA either way.
Premium cabin pax get two bags [MENTION=3667]70[/MENTION] lbs. Additionally, the 1K allowance is actually 3 bags [MENTION=3667]70[/MENTION] lbs.
Originally Posted by
jsloan
UA's policy is clear: assuming this was an economy class ticket, the passenger was not entitled to your luggage allowance just because the miles came from your account. There is fine print on the receipt that says that the traveler needs status in order to get the baggage charges waived. That said, DOT regulations
require that UA print the correct information on the receipt. While the old receipt format was probably
technicality compliant -- the correct value was printed on the receipt, crossed out, and replaced with $0 and then disclaimer -- the new receipt format
does not comply with the law. The correct baggage charges are not listed, even in a misleading way; you'd have to go to the website to find them.
I suggest asking UA for a refund based upon the receipt. When they decline, file a consumer complaint with the DOT here:
https://www.transportation.gov/airco...umer-complaint . It only takes a few minutes, and (a) it will get the complaint sent to someone at UA who's specifically tasked with regulatory compliance, and (b) it'll help get this issue on the DOT's radar.
For me, the new receipt seems to have a get-out-of-jail footnote for UA that says 1K membership needed, even if the ticket includes only a passenger without 1K status.
(MP award booked by 1K account for non-1K account)
That said, I still think it's unclear. It could mean that the 1K member just has to go to the airport with the traveller.