Originally Posted by
EdmFlyBoi
Kind of a ridiculous class action. The difference is one inch of pitch in economy and no seat back screens. One could argue (quite easily) that the seat width on the 67 makes up for the one inch loss of pitch. Do those changes justify 15% back in the cost of the ticket?
I have family who consistently pay more to fly AC just for the IFE.
And AC regularly charges for extra seat pitch.
So... maybe?