FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Did United Ever Have To Have "United Asia Airlines" For Taiwan?
Old Dec 14, 2020 | 2:13 am
  #7  
uanj
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 3,831
Originally Posted by hansyuwiwb
PanAm had to give up their flights to Taiwan when they first returned to China in 1981. The original flight was a 747SP doing NYC-TYO-BJS-SHA-TYO-NYC triangulation.

United didn't have the problem as the US didn't have a designated "flag carrier" after PanAm went bust. The Chinese government only required a separate entity to operate to Taiwan if the airline is designated as a "flag carrier" (thus NH and OZ never had to do anything weird like this. Ansett also flew to TPE under its own livery without issue, while also flying to Shanghai). Northwest Orient kept TPE routes after PamAm dropped it. This rule had not been rigorously enforced since the mid-2000s and was officially abandoned by CAACsometime around 2010 or 2011. KLM had a few 747s flying around with "Asia" livery until just a few years ago, but those were not necessary anymore - they just didn't repaint them.
In the 90s BA also flew to TPE (via HKG) and those planes had "英亚" on their tails, I forget the English name. Maybe British Asia? But no United Asia.

Like you I also heard back then the US carriers were not flag carriers so did not have this problem. But SQ was the flag carrier for Singapore, right? I do not recall them every having a different name on their planes and they had a ton of flights to Taiwan back then. I do not recall exactly when they started Mainland China service, maybe by that time the rule was not being enforced. I would have thought it was before mid 2000s though.

Last edited by uanj; Dec 14, 2020 at 2:27 am
uanj is offline