Originally Posted by
damnyourefine
Im glad they updated the stock email to reflect the new procedures.
Though, the line about having to remove personal ambassadors because governments around the world forced them to close their call centers hits me the wrong way. If they really wanted to keep personal ambassadors they could have adapted the AS airlines style of remote work.. it’s similar to Apple claiming that removing chargers from the sale of the new iPhone was purely for environmental reasons (whereas they accidentally said it was due to 5G costs prior).
Definitely agree. That's the only bit I thought to myself "that doesn't make sense". Literally, their role is to have access to a computer and a phone, precisely what almost all people now working from home in the same capacity needed. They could have said, based on the rate we pay the call centres it wasn't viable to provide them with a laptop? and reimburse phone activity.
I would actually laugh at that and think "fair enough".