Originally Posted by chicagorich
Isn't your assertion as broad and generalized as your complaint about TSA being branded incompetent?
No. Just look at the posts after every single article posted against LEOs/TSA on this forum and the choruses of "Amen!" before anything other than the media report.
Which wars and rights might you be thinking of here exactly...?
Vietnam? Korea?
Those are some of the few with no infringement of civil liberties in our nation's history. Look at the Civil War. Look at the War of 1812. Look at WWI. Look at rationing in WWII.
It is a disgrace to this country and a violation of the oath of office where the President pledges to preserve, protect and defend the constitution of the United States.
No it is not. It is a difference in interpretation. In YOUR interpretation it is a violation. In other's eyes it is not.
When you think of what Clinton did and how the Republicans rammed through an impeachment--Bush should already be standing in front of the American people and explaining himself for his breach in not fulfilling the oath of his office.
Name the lie that Bush told under oath. I am no Bush fan, but he hasn't committed a crime yet. And if you say he knowing lied about Iraq I will know where you get your sources from.....