FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Heathrow COVID-19 detection trials
View Single Post
Old May 6, 2020, 11:13 pm
  #15  
brunos
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,606
Originally Posted by Schind
Not sufficient is an understatment. They don't work. Here are some selected quotes from https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020...ad-coronavirus (Note to Holland-Kaye if you're watching - a lot of this data is from the studies you were asking PHE to provide)

"eight passengers who later tested positive for COVID-19 arrived in Shanghai from Italy and passed the airport screeners unnoticed"

"By 23 February, 46,016 air travelers had been screened; only one tested positive and was isolated for treatment,"

"Thermal scanners and handheld thermometers aren’t perfect. The biggest shortcoming is that they measure skin temperature, which can be higher or lower than core body temperature"

"Between August 2014 and January 2016, the review found, not a single Ebola case was detected among 300,000 passengers screened before boarding flights in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, which all had big Ebola epidemics."

"Taiwan, Singapore, Australia, and Canada all implemented entry screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), which is similar to COVID-19 and also caused by a coronavirus, during the 2002–03 outbreak; none intercepted any patients."

"During the 2014–16 Ebola epidemic, five countries asked incoming travelers about symptoms and possible exposure to patients and checked for fevers. They didn’t find a single case either."

"China and Japan mounted extensive entry screening programs during the H1N1 influenza pandemic of 2009, but studies found that the screenings captured small fractions of those actually infected with the virus and both countries had significant outbreaks anyway,"

"Researchers at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control concluded that approximately 75% of passengers infected with COVID-19 and traveling from affected Chinese cities would not be detected by entry screening."


And from https://edition.cnn.com/2020/02/19/h...cks/index.html

"At least one country has found airport temperature checks so unhelpful that it decided not to do them during the novel coronavirus outbreak. Israel used them in previous years for Ebola, SARS and H1N1, but found that they didn't work.
"It is ineffective and inefficient," said Dr. Itamar Grotto, associate director general of Israel's Ministry of Health."
Sure, this is not perfect.
Nowadays, one can easily find on the web dozens of articles pro or con any covid measures based on small samples and anecdotes. IN some way, that reminds me of the early controversy about wearing masks.

Sure, some people take fever-suppressant drugs. Sure, it will not stop spreading the disease.
Maybe it will only catch 20 or 30% (a number totally out of the blue) infected patients. It will also act as a deterrent for feverish people to travel.
Hong Kong has found quite a few British students who boarded flights (when UK closed schools/universities) suspecting they had Covid. If LHR had some detection, they would have been prevented to board. While a country might accept sick nationals, it will not accept sick visitors.The vast majority of HK cases (well over 90%) in the past months where returnees detected at the airport or soon thereafter in quarantine facilities.

I believe that you are mistaken f you think that travel restrictions for visitors (tourism or business) will be lifted in the near future without a range of precautions being taken at the departure airport. LHR basically lets anyone in and out and I doubt that it will continue.
brunos is offline