Originally Posted by
wiivile
I am not going to bring up the transferrability issue until AA asserts that they were mailers not addressed to me.
A good tactic.
AA told the DOT that there is a 48-month restriction in Citi's terms and conditions. Send the DOT your Citi terms, which of course do NOT have 48 month language. You have just proven that AA's letter to the DOT contains false information.
Will it hold up in court? Is it 100% proof of AA's lying? I have no idea. But will it--at the very least--demonstrate to the DOT that something is amiss with that AA form letter response? That's a good first step...