Originally Posted by skybluesea

Yes, it is worth pointing to parts of the article.

"It was a rare acknowledgement by the regulator that its oversight of the Max was flawed, and that Canada was unaware its system hindered regulators from seeing the aircraft’s deadly problems. "

and

"The Globe reported last week that Transport Minister Marc Garneau is overhauling the way Transport Canada vets new aircraft, looking at ways to increase Canada’s scrutiny of new planes, and rely less on the FAA process."

Circumstances that I called out before have come to light - failure of the Regulator, and now we need to hear from Air Canada on their due diligence failures in purchasing this product.

And for those who disagree, go back in this thread where the idea Regulator was NOT at fault was routinely promoted.

Air Canada come clean and explain your failure here - this will be vitally needed to re-build confidence (but since when does AC take responsibility for much)