Originally Posted by
AirbusFan2B
So... let’s not succumb to Stockholm syndrome - ironic, I know!
What Stockholm syndrome? The last thing I want is to pay higher fares so that UA will pass out higher ETCs when something goes wrong. It's the same reason that I oppose EU-style mandatory delay compensation in the US.
Originally Posted by
limey1K
Flight delayed twice and then overnight due to an issue with the cockpit computer that couldn't be checked out until the next day, hence the claim of a delay, not MX
Do you mean CXL? An issue with the cockpit computer is clearly MX (mechanical issue).