Originally Posted by
garykung
It is totally acceptable, as you have a fundamental misunderstanding.
According to
CA DMV:
"Financial responsibility (
commonly known as insurance) is required on all vehicles operated or parked on California roadways." Interestingly, the CA DMV does not actually require insurance, but instead accept the following:
"- Motor vehicle liability insurance policy.
- Cash deposit of $35,000 with DMV.
- DMV-issued self-insurance certificate.
- Surety bond for $35,000 from a company licensed to do business in California."
Because of this common misunderstanding, many simply ask for insurance. What they actually mean is proof of financial responsibility.
There is actually no law mandating how you need to pay for the damages if you are found to be responsible. Cash, insurance, credit card, etc. No one really cares as soon as it has been paid.
Bottom line, when the Enterprise agent really means financial responsibility, you are thinking liability coverage. Hence, the fundamental misunderstanding.
Did
srodr say that he was renting from an Enterprise location in California?
California, of course, is a special case, since it requires that rental-car
drivers have third-party liability insurance, apart from whatever coverage the rental-car company might have.
In some cases, California rental-car companies will provide free, but minimal, primary third-party liability insurance to the renter. Example: AARP members renting from Avis/Budget using the AARP discount code.