FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Shoe carnival and odd secondary screening at SEA
Old Sep 11, 2004 | 6:21 am
  #3  
Bart
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,389
Originally Posted by deephouse
My questions:

1) Whom should I contact to complain about the SEA "shoe carnival"? Calling the TSA Contact Center seems useless--I already did it to complain about a previous SEA shoe carnival incident (different pair of shoes), and although I was asked for a telephone number, I never received a return call. I followed up with an emailed and snail-mailed letter to the TSA's Customer Service Manager at SEA (his name and email address were posted on SEA's website) and again got no response. So I don't consider either of these to be worth a try.
I'm a TSA screener. I share your frustration about the shoes. In another thread, I mention that TSA needs to issue specific, detailed guidance about which shoes require secondary screening so we can avoid the broad interpretation that varies from airport to airport. Send your letter to the Federal Security Director, or FSD, of the airport. He (or she) is THE BOSS. Also mention how you didn't receive any responses from your other attempts. The FSD relies on them to respond to customer concerns and needs to know that it's not working. One recommendation, however: refer to "shoe policy." If you call it "shoe carnival," you're not helping your case and will most likely be dismissed, in a courteous and professional way, as just another whining passenger.

2) Is it proper for a screener to repeatedly run the wand over the same area? In the past, I've had screeners do just one pass over each body part, with a quick pat-down of the area if necessary to resolve any alarm (e.g., the time I forgot to remove my watch).
No. One pass is all that's required. However, in some instances, a screener may change the angle just to narrow down the source of the alarm. For example, if I pass the hand wand parallel to the floor in by the waist area as the passenger is holding his belt open, I can't always tell if the area alarmed or if I just re-alarmed the belt buckle. So I will turn the wand perpendicular and run it across to make sure I don't inadvertently re-alarm the belt buckle. What screeners are not supposed to do is pass the wand over until they finally get a beep. In all fairness to screeners, however, you also have to keep in mind what's going on around you. Sometimes a screener will hear the wand beep but not be sure if it was his wand that beeped or another wand being used by another screener hand-wanding someone else close by. Usually, you can tell by the different pitch. But every once in a while, we'll happen to inadvertently wand the same areas on our respective passengers at the same time. I avoid this by allowing whoever is adjacent to me get started first.

3) What's up with the wand repeatedly beeping in the absence of metal? A faulty wand, perhaps?
Wand beeps, there's metal in there somewhere. You just don't realize it. Zipper tabs, zippers, button snaps, metallic hooks, rivets, etc will alarm because the hand-wand is being passed closely to your body. The wand is not faulty when it alarms.

4) Is it proper for a screener to pat down the belt area if the wand doesn't alarm there? I'd never experienced that before.
No. It is not proper. If you didn't alarm and the screener pats you down, then you should notify the supervisor. When you alarm, the screener should first ask you if you have anything in the area that could cause the alarm. Frequent instances are, for example, a piece of tinfoil, a penny, or other small item that the passenger is not aware sets off the hand wand that's inside a pants pocket. After the passenger removes the metal item, the screener re-wands the area. If it alarms again, then the screener will pat down the area.

General rule of thumb is this: before touching you, a screener must explain the need to pat you down.

There are exceptions, although it's usually not good practice to deviate from the written rule. Acceptable exceptions are, for instance, patting down the rivets on jeans located along the hips or waist. It's clear that whatever caused the alarm isn't something inside a pants pocket, so the screener automatically pats down the area where the rivets are located. Like I said, this isn't official TSA practice but screeners and passengers accept it. If a screener were to stop each and every time the wand beeped and go through the required explanations for a pat-down, the hand-wanding would take much longer. The other thing is, and this is common with frequent travelers, that they don't want the verbal explanations, they just want the screener to get on with it. "I fly all the time, you don't have to explain it to me. Let's go and just get this over with."

5) Are private secondary screenings supposed to be done differently from their "public" counterparts, aside from the additional screener to serve as a witness?
Yes. That's why they're called private screening. It means that for whatever reason, you prefer not to be screened in public. And that's okay. It's your right. However, to protect both you and the screener, a second screener is present as a witness.

Don't know what you mean by "done differently" other than location.
Bart is offline