Originally Posted by
godsavethepoints
Here's a simple comparison: Cathay Pacific.
Cathay, on the same frame has 46 J, 32 W and 256 Y seats for a total of 334. BA has 56 J, 56 W and 219 Y for a total of 331.
Tell me that either every airline is idiotic, and BA are the only wizards, or tell me how they squeeze 10 more J seats, more than 20 more W seats into that same space, while only sacrificing a seat count of 3, with a heavy Y configuration from CX? Do 37 Y seats on Cathay equal the space taken by 34 J + W seats on BA - and a "club kitchen".
Cathay has an extra inch of pitch in Y. And they actually squeezed in more J seats at the front due to their terrible config where the toilets open onto some J seats. And CX crew also complain about cramped galleys.