Oh, no.To prove your own statement is your homework. Not mine. If you can't be bothered to prove it is of course your choice. So is my choice to consider whatever you write a complete nonsense. However, I did your homework and I found this in Bjorns corner

• The A321NEO flight controls commands were modified, in response to customer requests, for certain flight phases to improve the dynamism of the aircraft. The changes introduced, are not linked to the size, location or weight associated to the installation of the engines.
• It is these changes, which, together with some existing control characteristics (again not related to the size, location or weight of the engines) mean that in the very remote combination of conditions, described above, they could lead to the reduction in efficiency of the angle of attack protection, and could lead to “excessive pitch”.
• This was identified during extensive computer based simulator testing. It was not identified neither during flight tests nor in response to in-service reports nor as part of studies being performed in relationship to any other events related to other aircraft types which are currently being widely discussed

So no, the A32N does not have the same problems caused by larger engines as the 737MAX. Please stop posting this nonsense.

https://leehamnews.com/2019/07/19/bj...itch-up-issue/