FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Upgrade waitlist / display / clearing issues since PlusPoints changeover
Old Dec 16, 2019 | 3:38 am
  #37  
QBK
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: WAS-ish
Programs: UA 1K-MM + UC, Marriott Plat, National Exec
Posts: 1,343
Originally Posted by Kacee
3 are always blocked for crew rest on the Polaris 772. Also, note that if Y were oversold, the block would be in PE.

Not saying the list wasn't mess, that seems to be the norm lately.
Ah, this is good to know; I was wondering about that (because the 3 blocked seats seemed to be occupied on the seat map as well). Thanks for clarifying that! Although... oddly enough, the “blocked” number fluctuated between +2 and +3 until about T-12, which is weird if 3 are blocked for crew rest.

However, on this flight PE seemed to be either full or close to it. So... the block for over sale would probably extend “through” PE into J, right? FWIW, they were soliciting volunteers, and Y showed as “full” on standby, so there’s additional circumstantial evidence that Y was oversold.

Originally Posted by lotemblizej
One possibility here is that the system mistakenly prioritizes ANYONE who requests both upgrades (Y to PE and PE to C) over those who request only an upgrade from Y to C. Thus, a silver could leap over a GS or 1K on the list into C. Most of the problems reported seem to relate to clearing into C, not PE. Just speculation, but the cause appears to be a major glitch in the new system that, as pointed out above, may be hard to diagnose and fix.
This is possible. To add complexity, there’s also a new class of upgraders in the mix: people who booked PE and are waitlisted for J. They’re supposed to be prioritized over all Y—>J upgrades (except maybe GS?). But Y pax who request both PE and J and have been upgraded to PE should not get higher priority. So... I can see a lot of opportunities for UA’s web coding team to make mistakes in the logic.
QBK is offline