Originally Posted by
kenpasadena
* Hapuna versus Mauna Kea - You can walk over to Mauna Kea via a paved path over the golf course or along a rugged coastal path around the coast. Both are hot if you go in the afternoon sun as we did. Take water and sturdy shoes if you decide on the hike. Mauna Kea is a smaller beach, maybe more swimmable and with more fish as it's rockier and protected (so calmer water). Hotel is closer to the beach. You get bright orange towels - so if you are visiting from Hapuna you stick out like a sore thumb with your white beach towels. There is a nice casual grill restaurant right on the beach at Mauna Kea. You can do room charge there if you are staying at Hapuna. We had drinks and nibbles at the bar upstairs with a nice view of the bay. We didn't feel like there was a huge upgrade from the common areas, beach and pool at Mauna Kea versus Hapuna. We liked the pool at Hapuna better and felt the beach was nice at both places. Mauna Kea is the classic mid-century design, has the mistique of the original big resort on the big island and probably has nice rooms. So up to you what you want. Both hotels are very nice.
We found the MK dark and dated. It's design, while trying to convey an "island" feel, was an Orientalist themed fail. It might have passed muster in the 70s/80s, but it is desperately in need of an update. We have no idea what the rooms are like, but I would guess they offer little that is superior to the Westin Hapuna's rooms, whilst charging a significantly steeper nightly rate. In our experience, the service there was also in need of a revamp. While there were no egregious service mishaps, there were just enough flaws to make one question why anyone would pay nearly $1000/night (during peak season, when we stayed) to stay there.