FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Bloomberg article on SAS - can’t be good
Old Nov 8, 2019, 2:27 pm
  #125  
GUWonder
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by highupinthesky
I know LH don't have any long haul out of CPH, but it's not just the long haul that DY have cut in CPH. A lot of the short hauls have been cut too. DY are serving more destinations out of CPH than the LH group, but I'm pretty sure the LH group have more flights and is moving more pax's on short haul in/out of CPH than DY at the moment. When you add the long haul, DY might move more pax's in/out of CPH, but not if you look at short haul alone.
Norwegian is indeed a fraction of what it was 12 months ago at CPH, while LH group goes from strength to strength in serving CPH, but the point really is that LH group isn’t as heavily dependent on Scandinavian traffic for its financial performance as SAS or Norwegian is and thus it’s not as objective to use LH financials as the basis for applauding SAS as to use DY.
GUWonder is offline