Originally Posted by
Dave Noble
Do not comprehend the analogy - if someone has a bag that is over the limit, then the bag is always non compliant - not someone inadvertently going over the limit
Something that is over the limit and is always over the limit is something that should be addressed
You're joking right? You seriously don't understand the analogy?
By your logic, someone or something over the limit should always be addressed. So next time you're out there driving 65 on 60, I expect you'll call your nearest police department and notify them of your crime? After all, no better way to address something than to address it yourself!
AA should be focusing on the 3rd bag folks, yes, but to equate them with those who's bags may be a smidgen over the limit (or even worse, someone carrying a newspaper or jacket) is just beyond absurd.