Originally Posted by
Gig103
Assuming like I did that fresh toiletries always are supplied in room changeover, said tampering was previously limited to staff or suppliers which is far less likely. And tampering with those minis is more time consuming by potential perpetrators so the impact is likely to be less widespread.
Why do you assume fresh toiletries are always supplied in the room changeover. If I don't use the conditioner, is it changed? If I only use the lotion once and put it back in its place, is it automatically replaced. Do they just throw all the toiletries out after every stay whether you use them or not?
I have no hair, so if they throw out the unopened shampoo and conditioner after every stay, what a phenomenal waste.
Lets use logic.
The single use toiletries were NEVER tamper proof.
The large sized toiletries are ALWAYS tamper proof.
How does it stand to reason that suddenly now that they are tamper proof, they are going to be more messed with?