Originally Posted by tt7
Why would you want a "snack" (however defined) at 3 or 4pm? Do you normally have a "snack" at that time?
I'm probably outside the 'norm' on this issue but I've never understood the fixation that a lot of people seem to have that, every time they get on an airplane, they must be fed. Why?
If you believe that not getting a "snack" on a 2hour 31minute flight, scheduled for 3pm, is worth complaining about, go ahead. Frankly, if I was the AA person receiving the complaint, I'd just "file" it.
No need to get all riled up about it.
I'm not really looking to complain. I was curious though.
There is a part of me that feels that First, whether paid or though upgrades, is more costly than coach and that there should be upgraded service amenities. And, considering that our outbound flights had a regular meal service, I was surprised that the snack was so, well, limited.
Just the same, since our flight was delayed 90 minutes and AA was kind enough to call me early to let me know of the delay, I had a "real" lunch before arriving at MCO.