FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Is this a fare break?
View Single Post
Old Jul 31, 2019 | 12:28 am
  #28  
jsloan
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 25,580
Originally Posted by sinoflyer
I don't know if there is a distinction betwen an instant upgrade fare (VAP30UPN) and a sell-up fare that you brought up for SFOAUS, which books into revenue Z. Perhaps with instant upgrades, not all flights in the combination, particularly the less-significant one, needs to be P>0 for the booking engine to offer/sell.
Well, it's specifically allowing this because the VAP30UPN fare doesn't have a V inventory restriction, and it delegates into Y, not V, when P is not available. And it's showing up in the search results because it's the cheapest available fare: it's cheaper than a coach ticket on that date.

That used to happen regularly, but it mostly disappeared when UA went to differential-based pricing. But the EWR-LAX fare table is really messed up, at least for that date. You've got the cheapest available fare: VAP30UPN, at $644 + tax, which books into P with no inventory restriction and a 30-day advance purchase. The cheapest available Z fare is YAZ21UPN, at $1094 plus tax and a 21-day advance purchase. And, if you wanted to fly economy on that date... you need to go to MAA0AQEY, at $1124 plus tax. Admittedly, it's refundable, and the others aren't, but that's still a pretty hefty penalty.

So, these fares are written as if they use differential pricing, but they're missing the inventory restriction that makes the differential work. Thus: business class cheaper than economy. (And even if they had the inventory restriction, the YAZ21UPN fare is way out of sequence).
jsloan is offline