Originally Posted by
yulred
I mean, "self-congratulating profitable airline lacks resources to provide basic services" is more accurate than "Pax are cheap" here. But acknowledging that admittedly requires one to give up some dogmas. Which can be difficult.
I think it's more that "self-congratulating profitable airline don't see a need for providing basic services" as long as cheapening the product seemingly makes customers happier. If they would find out customers take their business elsewhere they would surely improve service... But it seems no matter how badly they are treated, they keep coming back anyway. So where is the incentive for airlines to provide better service? But no, it's not that I like it. Seems just to be reality. Plus, it's clear that the FT demographics don't fit in that category.