Originally Posted by
GetSetJetSet
I have heard from several people that it's quite far from the city and it's nice if you never want to leave the resort, but not practical if you plan to see things in Chiang Mai and spend time there for meals or in the evening as it's a long drive. Can anyone comment on this, and if this is indeed the case, is there another good option in Chiang Mai? Thanks!
Four Seasons is indeed far outside of the city, and is really best for relatively short stays with most time spent on property or in the environs, which are beautiful countryside.
If you really want the best location in Chiang Mai, to experience the city and be able to go anywhere else you want on day trips, the best option, by far, is Anantara Chiang Mai. The former Chedi is still under the same ownership as it always was, but is now under an Anantara management contract. Go for either a river view or garden view Kasara (club) suite. These are extremely spacious junior suites inclusive of generous club benefits.
The Dhara Dhevi is still lovely in certain categories, but is not quite as centrally located as Anantara. Its Colonial accommodation and its original reception area are currently undergoing some renovations, but that isn’t something that will disrupt a stay.
I am not a fan of 137 Pillars House. It may have opened well, but I certainly would not choose to spend my time or money there over Anantara or Dhara Dhevi, not by any means.