Originally Posted by
moral_low_ground
Typical sound bite politics and you take a sentence out of my post completely out of context to arrive at the wrong conclusion.
As you can see (or maybe not ???), I offered many reasons to avoid/dislike QR in Y both in the air and at their home base. The fact that the Country also has many other dubious practices is not my basis for not liking the airline I just happened to mention it.
Well, I guess I could have dwelled more on your apparent need for extra alcohol, the seat pitch (which is no worse than a BA 787), QR lounges or Y food and IFE (which is the same IFE in all classes). But instead what stuck out was your need to "couple this with slavery for immigrants" etc and your apparent HATRED of QR.
So I don't believe the sentence was out of context as you chose to "couple it" with your other comments, meaning that by definition you have clearly chosen to make it a part of your overall argument.