Originally Posted by
FlyingUnderTheRadar
What will be interesting is that this occurred at SFO where the 9th Circuit ruling applies (but not nationwide).
So?
Originally Posted by
wco81
I thought you really had no choice but to unlock?
Actually, you do have a choice not to unlock.
But again - CBP has the authority to seize the device in question for further search (i.e. you don't unlock it, I unlock it for you).
Originally Posted by
wco81
Speculation about whether he was targeted.
He was definitely targeted somehow. The BP showed SSSS did mean something.
Unsure if the SSSS has anything nexus with the mess with CBP.